alphabet of the obsolete

Many things get obsoleted quite quickly in technology. It is interesting to see things obsoleted outside of the tech world but because of technology never the less. Although things get replaced with better and more functional creations, I can’t help but feel nostalgic about both photosensitive picture films and VHS tapes. Memories…

Wrong Hands

alphabet of the obsolete

View original post

Hey Firefox Make Me Recommend You

I love Firefox. It is my primary browser and I don’t feel at home using another browser. I want to use Firefox to browse the web because Mozilla has always taken the high road when tackling issues of web openness and standardization. HTML5 wouldn’t have been possible without the vision that Mozilla and Opera pushed through WHATWG and I am really grateful for such diligence. I also use some extensions that have made the web work for me and I don’t seem to find these features implemented on other browsers to my liking. Last but not least, I will only use an open source browser for the fact that an actively developed open environment is less likely to contain defects that allow malicious remote access to my machine.

All that said, I’ve had a hard time recommending Firefox to my relatives. I am by far the geekiest person in my family tree. Hardly do I come across someone in my personal life who cares about the browser itself. Most of my friends and acquaintances are Internet Explorer users who have no less than three toolbars already. Because of that I want them to move off of Internet Explorer and onto Firefox instead. Contrary to my aspirations I don’t see myself recommending Firefox to anyone. I always make them install Google Chrome or install it for them myself. Here are my reasons for that:

  1. Google Chrome auto updates. This is the biggest concern when trying to recommend a browser to my non-geek friends and relatives. I cannot rely on them to update and they have an affinity to dismiss any update window. Manual updates are a doctrine that only I seem to believe in. Everybody else doesn’t want it since the system already works. Their facebook is fine.
  2. Google Chrome blocks invasive add-ons. Them add-ons, you can’t live with’em and you can’t live without’em. I love add-ons. But all my social graph have spyware instead. It just floats onto their systems and I’m totally incapable of preempting their installation. The reason behind this is that the knowledge threshold for understanding malware is higher than that of the average user. I get to see these disasters only when facebook doesn’t work.
  3. Google Chrome is easy to use. There are no training wheels on the Google Chrome bicycle but boy is it really easy to ride. This is probably the result of Google starting with a clean slate and adding user interface elements only if needed. Surprisingly though, there isn’t much difference between browsing interfaces of all major browsers, but the effect is still felt by every non-geek who compares Chrome and Firefox.

It saddens me every time I recommend Google Chrome and not Firefox to the people I know. I try to explain that I use Firefox and install it for them, but they easily go back to Internet Explorer and don’t care about the consequences. Their indifference to risk and lack of understanding of how they are jeopardizing themselves is the primary reason I push them towards Chrome. After all, all I want is that they have a properly patched system.

On a positive note, Firefox seems to be getting silent auto updates, also known as Electrolysis, sometime in the future. The capability of plugins and extensions to overtake Firefox is somewhat mitigated by asking the user whether to allow a plugin or extension to install or not. Australis is getting better at usability but somewhat slowly. Maturing a new UI and design paradigm is paramount but time is always of the essence. Hurry up Mozilla.

In our ever connected world we usually forget to look at our old habits that made us the engaging humans we are. I vividly remember when my notion of preserving a memory was nothing more than a photo in an album of family gatherings and yearly occasions like Christmases and birthdays. In fact most of my old family photos are about Christmas. We had one camera at home and it could only take twenty four photos per film roll. When we took pictures, we tried our best to make sure everyone is looking at the camera and smiling. Changing the film was not somethings we often did and you can only imagine how excited I was when my parents popped the camera open. We couldn’t open the camera until all twenty four shots were taken because the film was photo sensitive and would get ruined if it wasn’t reeled to the very end. What a long story about family photos and I haven’t said much.

On the other hand we nowadays only think of the story in the photo. We pull out our phones at every street corner and at every occasion and our lives are plastered all over the internet. We keep a record of everything everywhere because we want to tell others about our lives and make them a part of it, even if in a very small way. We’re living in the picture frame more than we are living outside of it. It isn’t in anyway a bad thing to capture a story in frame but sometimes the story outside the frame is interesting as well.

Wrong Hands

vintage social networking

View original post

I couldn’t write more than what has already been written about Neil Armstrong’s life or death so here is a reblog of LIFE magazine’s special edition of the moon landing.